At: http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/2007/08/serious-cold-st.html
At
a time when revisionists are attempting to deny what many of us
witnessed firsthand--the decisive role of the Israel Lobby in
bringing about the Iraq War, and many other disasters for the United
States--Professors Walt and Mearsheimer have published a book that
irrefutably sets forth the documentation of this role. What follows
are some comments by Phil Weiss, a jewish writer for whom the
expression "my country" is unambiguous--he means the USA.
http://www.philipweiss.org/
Walt and Mearsheimer’s book on the Israel Lobby is
being published today. I finished it last night. I said before that
it was historic, but I did not realize quite what it was till I put
it down: a great work of American muckraking in the tradition of
Upton Sinclair's The Jungle (the meatpacking industry), Rachel
Carson’s Silent Spring (pesticides), and Ralph Nader's Unsafe
at Any Speed (Detroit).
...the main reason the book cannot be
ignored is that the arguments go much further, and are devastating.
Simply put, the book proves that the tail has wagged the dog on the
greatest foreign policy mistake of the last 40 years, a mistake that
has caused incredible suffering in Iraq and the U.S., and blasted my
country's image. The evidence the authors marshal is so compelling
that it leaves me, as a progressive Jew, weeping with distress over
what the fervid particularist imagination of rightwing Jews has done
to my country.
I would point to one sentence in the book that
I found heartbreaking. The authors describe in detail the neocon
vision of transforming the Middle East as democracies by starting
with Iraq. The dream that peace in Jerusalem would begin with war in
Baghdad, which has ended in such a miserable failure, grew out of the
conviction that Israel was a great democracy and that its treatment
of the Palestinians would be overlooked once the U.S. changed Arab
societies. It is a complete delusion; and yet its power over Jews of
even liberal stripe can be glimpsed this week in The New Republic...
I've been reading the book this August and have three
preliminary impressions: Serious, cold and stunning. The seriousness
of the book is conveyed on every page. The arguments are calm and
earnest, stripped of metaphor and coyness. These are mature men
engaged in every sinew with a giant squid of an issue; and their 106
pages of endnotes are overwhelming, and give the lie to anyone who
accuses these scholars of "shoddy scholarship."
Cold.
The authors are conservative realists at heart. They see states as
amoral and a little vicious, and they don't overheat their arguments.
There is no joy in the book, and the fervor is hidden beneath
mountains of cold logic. They are reserved, and tactical. They refuse
to really take on the dual-loyalty problem (just as Tony Judt refused
in his speech at NYU last year) but you sense that they believe it's
a problem (as I do). They generally say that the lobby has every
right to do what it does, but their underlying zeal comes out--I
think, admirably--when they state that the suppression of free speech
on this issue is inappropriate and undemocratic. David Remnick's
anger at the authors--he accuses them of wanting Israel to
disappear-- seems to me a response to that zeal, and though he
misdescribes it, the reader can feel the great molten energy
underneath the icy words.
As for stunning, the argument they
present is towering and clear and about time. The revision of Israeli
history is stirring. The ways that the lobby has diminished the
suffering of the Palestinians and enabled the occupation and
settlements are starkly and even emotionally described. Most stunning
is the argument that Remnick accepts: the authors' description of the
Iraq disaster as arising from the lobby's pressure. I study this
issue, and yet I turned the pages of this chapter with my mouth open,
especially the pages dealing with the manipulation of intelligence,
and evidence of Israel's hand in the WMD lies. It is this section
that should and must stir national debate, and now.